Friday, June 29, 2018

The Storytelling Power of a Complex Villain



            I remember the first time I watched Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight. I sat in the large theater auditorium with candy at the ready to see what many critics were citing as an evolution in superhero films. As the dark, smoky, blue flamed Batman logo came across the screen, the now famous opening scene began, and we were introduced to the Joker. Right from the beginning, Nolan’s version distinguished himself from the Mark Hamill animated Joker and Jack Nicholson’s famous portrayal of the character. This Joker was malevolent with an iron purpose but also sadistically funny. He would go off on a philosophical tangent, and then, in the same scene, transform into the wacky clown persona the character is known for but with an uncannily darker and tragic twist. What ended up being the most thought provoking and terrifying aspect of the character was just how relatable he was to me.
Heath Ledger as the Joker
            No, I have never taken the opportunity in my spare time to conquer Gotham City, but the idea that there is a potential villain in all of us is powerful. The Joker’s motivation in The Dark Knight is that anyone of us has the capability of being as evil as him. To demonstrate this, he tries to break Harvey Dent and Batman with him turning the former into a monster through trials that would stagger anyone’s moral grounding. Even at the end of the film he tells Batman, “You see, madness, as you know, is like gravity. All it takes is a little push” before laughing manically at him changing Harvey Dent into Two-Face. While the Joker is one of the biggest villains in pop culture, there are others that affect audiences in a similar manner. A character who can resemble the worst parts of humanity, and yet, be entertaining and thought provoking. A character who an audience can empathize with or understand that character’s actions regardless of morally shaky ground they take. It’s both fascinating and scary but not a recent development.
            Archetypes of heroes and villains are nothing new to storytelling. They have existed throughout human history dating back to ancient mythologies and religious texts because without conflict, there really is not a story to be told. With a problem, most of the time provided by an antagonist, audiences can follow the hero’s journey to beat the villain. The one who is in the moral right defeating that who possess an immoral nature. This self-insertion into these archetypes is part of why we gravitate towards stories. We love to watch an underdog like David defeating the towering Goliath in battle and to envision ourselves as David being the hero, but villains take on many forms beyond just a giant. Not all villains are characterized so simply.
Bryan Cranston as Walter White
            One critical aspect of a complex villain is for the character to follow an inverted journey compared to a protagonist. One of my favorite characters in pop culture is Walter White from the show Breaking Bad. White is unique because his story follows this tragic transformation from high school chemistry teacher to drug kingpin, Heisenberg. A dramatic shift, but White’s complexity lends the character credibility throughout the series with each heinous act. If you have not seen the entire series (first off, go watch it now), his motivation to get into the meth trade begins with trying to support his family because of a terminal cancer diagnosis. As he delves deeper into that trade, he becomes accustomed to power and the corruption it brings. He loses sight of that noble crusade to provide for his family after his death, which brought him into that dangerous world. An example of this change happens in a later season when tells his partner Jesse Pinkman, “You asked me if I was in the meth business or the money business. Neither. I’m in the empire business.” Clearly showcasing his differing priorities from the beginning of the series, Walter White has been consumed by his Heisenberg persona, and viewers see the complexity of that change on his character.
            Regardless of the mediums like superhero films, television series, and novels, an antagonist can range from simple to complex. They can be the character who is in it solely for power, vengeance, or they can simply be a monster. Classic villains from different mediums within pop culture: Sauron, Darth Vader, and Norman Bates are well known for these traits, and have established a trend for other writers to follow with their antagonists. However, to me, scarier and more thought-provoking villains are those who an audience can self-insert into and sympathize with. Characters like the Joker and Walter White allow an audience to self-reflect on themselves by asking the question, would I be capable of doing that if pushed far enough into darkness? That is good storytelling.
Name your top 5 favorite villains in the comments!
My list:
1.     The Joker, no specific version
2.     Walter White from Breaking Bad
3.     Hans Landa from Inglorious Bastards
4.     Gollum from Lord of the Rings
5.     Judge Holden from Blood Meridian
           
           

Friday, June 22, 2018

A Bad Sounding Masterpiece: Trout Mask Replica

            1969 was a seminally important year for popular music, specifically rock music. Albums like Abbey Road by The Beatles, Led Zeppelin II by Led Zeppelin, and Tommy by The Who were released by bands that had helped define 1960’s rock music as well influencing the types of rock that would be popularized in the early 1970s. These and other artists eventually created sub-genres like psychedelic rock, garage rock, and art rock with other bands taking to these sub-genres and expanding on what rock music could be. Of these sub-genres, one of the more out there styles sonically that become prominent was experimental rock with Frank Zappa and The Velvet Underground being two of its early pioneers. However, in the playground that is experimental rock, Captain Beefheart and his Magic Band created one of the weirdest, confusing, and avant-garde sounding rock albums ever. This album is known for its unique, and at times, bad sound, but also hailed for its importance in experimentation of song structure, instrumentation, and lyrics. With its odd legacy, the album Trout Mask Replica is 1 hour and 14 minutes of adventure into the sonic unknown that should be experienced at least once by any listener of music.
            Before even getting into the description of the music, the lore surrounding this album’s creation should be addressed. The band rehearsed the songs in Los Angeles for months during 1968 in a small rented house with Beefheart taking complete artistic control of the process. He was known for berating the band members with even going as far as acting violent towards them whenever the rehearsals wouldn’t go to his liking. The band’s financial situation wasn’t any better. The group was always strapped for cash, and on one occasion, resorted to stealing food with fellow avant-garde musician and producer Frank Zappa covering the bail for said members. This style continued into the following year once Beefheart and his Magic Band entered the studio to record Trout Mask Replica.
            Once in the studio, the album’s recording took place in short sessions in March of 1969. The Magic Band recorded 20 instrumental tracks in a six-hour session, which is insane in a contemporary recording context with many bands taking years to record a 12-track album. From this sporadic instrument tracking, Beefheart overdubbed vocals but not in traditional sense, obviously. Instead of wearing studio headphones, he would record vocals with hearing the tracked instruments through the windows of the vocal booth. When asked the reasoning behind this creative choice, Beefheart stated that he wished for a chaotic type of recording process because “That’s what they do before a commando raid, isn’t it?” This unconventional process of recording helps to understand as to why the music was revolutionary in experimental rock.
            From my first time listening to this album to the 5th or so time going over it, I always end up pondering the harsh collision between Beefheart’s vocals and the ensemble of instrumentation that are chaotic but charming. In almost every song, the band and the vocalist are engaged in some type of sonic warfare to see who would come out on top in the mix. This creates a tension that, at times, made me laugh at the shouting match between Beefheart’s vocals and the band in a song like “Moonlight on Vermont,” with its nail scratching chalkboard lead guitar accompanied by one of the weirdest rock rhythms I have ever heard. This fearlessness of the unknown is exhibited in the lyrical writing as well, which lends the lyrics to be read by a master of decoding or ciphers to understand what Beefheart means when he sings, “Hope lost his head ‘n got off on alligators Somebody's leavin’ peanuts on the curbins.” These musical elements in this one song are continuous throughout the other 27 songs, which made my first time listening so memorable.             
Captain Beefheart
            One of my favorite parts of the album happens during the opening song, “Frownland,” where Beefheart sings with the vibrato of a man who has just slain some type of demonic woodland creature (I'm looking at you squirrels), “My smile is stuck. I cannot go back to your frownland.” To me, these lyrics sum up what tone or mood the record goes for; finding the absurdity in life's more trying or difficult moments can lead to humor. That life is hectic and spontaneous and should not be met with a frown but with a smile. So yes, Captain Beefheart, I am certainly not going back to “Frownland,” and neither will you once you take the time to listen to this odd record.

I’d like to thank my friend Kyle Silva for recommending this album to me. 
Let me know in the comments your thoughts on this album or other weird music you have heard before!

Link to the song "Frownland": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9lpLm7jwQY

Link to the entire record: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zdLfPN6F-o&t=824s

Sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58nPEe-TU-w&t=127s
http://vpinterviews.blogspot.com/2005/04/magic-band.html
From Zig Zag magazine, No. 8, 1969 (as cited by M. Barnes in Captain Beefheart)http://www.ew.com/article/2010/12/17/captain-beefheart-dies/

Thank You Stan Lee

            Let’s start with a story. My first experience with a superhero video game was the PlayStation classic Spiderma...